By Liz Stanley
Breaking Out, one of many classics of feminist sociology, was once released via Routledge Kegan Paul in 1983 and hailed as a pioneering textual content within the improvement of a unique feminist epistemology. it's been everyday and stated for almost a decade. during this revised variation, Liz Stanley and Sue clever find Breaking Out and its serious reception by way of educational feminism then and now, and evaluate the most advancements in feminist considering on examine concerns because it first seemed.
Read or Download Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology PDF
Best feminist theory books
This ebook bargains a serious feminist standpoint at the commonly debated subject of transitional justice and forgiveness. Louise Du Toit examines the phenomenon of rape with a feminist philosophical discourse referring to women’s or ‘feminine’ subjectivity and selfhood. She demonstrates how the hierarchical dichotomy of male energetic as opposed to lady passive sexuality – which obscures the real nature of rape – is embedded within the dominant western symbolic body.
A feminist method of the historical past of contemporary philosophy finds new insights into the lives and works of significant figures akin to Jean-Jacques Rousseau and David Hume, and is essential to an appreciation of the arrival of feminist philosophy. Feminism and glossy Philosophy introduces scholars to the most thinkers and issues of contemporary philosophy from assorted feminist views, and highlights the function of gender in learning vintage philosophical texts.
During this intercourse which isn't One, Luce Irigaray elaborates on the various significant topics of Speculum of the opposite lady, her landmark paintings at the prestige of lady in Western philosophical discourse and in psychoanalytic thought. In 11 acute and greatly ranging essays, Irigaray reconsiders the query of girl sexuality in a number of contexts which are suitable to present dialogue of feminist conception and perform.
Selection impressive educational name 2002 as soon as the egalitarian passions of the yank Revolution had dimmed, the hot country settled right into a conservative interval that observed the criminal and social subordination of ladies and non-white males. one of the Founders who introduced the fledgling govt into being have been those that sought to set up order during the reconstruction of racial and gender hierarchies.
- Doing Time: Feminist Theory and Postmodern Culture
- Doing feminism: teaching and research in the academy
- Emergent Writing Methodologies in Feminist Studies
- Deleuze and Guattari’s Immanent Ethics: Theory, Subjectivity, and Duration
Additional info for Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology
To explore this means that we must go back to an exploration of the meaning, for us, of feminism and its implications for the research process; and a discussion of this is indeed the main focus of this book. But, to get back to our previous argument, it should be pointed out that some feminists find the production of quantitative, ‘hard’, data perfectly acceptable or even preferable. They reject the identification of particular methods with men and masculinity and the labelling of these as necessarily sexist.
She characterizes ‘the female critique’ as ‘normal science’. By this she means that it accepts existing social science assumptions, beliefs, ways of working and ways of viewing the world, and is concerned with removing sexism from these rather than producing any more radical alternative. While Bernard is largely approving of this emphasis in feminist academic work, we find it merely the beginning of a fully developed feminist alternative. We shall discuss this more fully at the end of this chapter, but the substance of our argument concerns our rejection of ‘normal science’.
While emphasizing that she is concerned primarily with ‘traditional scientific’ research, nevertheless Kelly does make points which are applied more generally. For example, she argues that separating-off ‘objectivity’ and ‘rationality’ by feminist researchers as masculine traits, and then rejecting these because of this, is dangerous. This is because these ‘can be seen as the fullest development of our intellectual capabilities, and we should not lightly disown them’ (Kelly, 1978, p. 229). Of course, one’s reactions to this statement depend entirely on how concepts such as ‘objectivity’ and ‘rationality’ are defined; but Kelly seems to treat their meaning as unproblematic.
Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology by Liz Stanley